In Mary Lynn Damhorst and Patricia A. Kimle’s “Symbolic interaction: A Grounded theory Model of the Ideal Business Image for the Women”, “fashion excessively in business can be seen as exhibitionism” (Damhorst 54) and being too trendy in the workplace can “communicate negative ideas, including a lack of judgment in personal decisions and a tendency to conform easily” (53). While the authors are referring to the corporate business world where conservative fashion is preferred, I decided to test out fashion exhibitionism in the fashion industry. For my dress up field experiment, I decided to apply for a summer internship at a few major fashion magazines: Vogue, Elle, W, and Harper’s Bazaar. I submitted my real resume and cover letter to different departments in each magazine and I was called in for an interview at Vogue Paris for a fashion internship position and at Elle for an accessories internship position. Both magazines encourage the use of luxury goods and fashion trends so for my field experiment, I decided to test the limits of conspicuous consumption at an interview in the fashion industry. Thorstein Veblen defined conspicuous consumption as extravagant spending on products to display wealth and social status. However, Veblen’s context of extravagant spending referred to the product’s “solidity and durability… solidity, permanence and indestructibility” (Bauman 30). Today, conspicuous consumption refers exclusively to the brand of the product rather than its quality. People often make snap judgments on people’s success based on the brands associated with the things they own. In The Language of Clothes, Alison Lurie states that the language of dress announces your “sex, age, and class… through what you are wearing” as well as give clues to “your occupation, origin, personality, opinions, tastes, sexual desires and current mood” (Lurie 3). Lurie states that this information can be inferred based on what you’re wearing even before the person talks to you. In the fashion industry, an industry where luxury brands are heavily encouraged, would dressing conspicuously hurt one’s performance in a job interview?
For my experiment, I decided to choose an appropriate interview outfit consisting of a silk blouse and a skirt. For my Vogue Paris interview, I chose to keep my outfit more on the conservative side. For my Elle interview, I decided to convey wealth and conspicuous leisure through dress. When deciding which accessories to add, I made sure the accessories either had a visible and easily recognizable logo or is eye catching and sparkly.
Weds. March 9th 11am Conservative Outfit for Vogue Paris Interview: Rag & Bone Blouse, BCBG Skirt, Miu Miu Bag |
Fri. Mar. 4th 3pm: Flashy Outfit for Elle Interview: Eryn Brinie Trench, Sly Rabbit Fur Vest, Silk Blouse, 3.1 Phillip Lim Collar, Alexander McQueen Scarf, D&G belt, Zara Skirt, Louis Vuitton Bag |
My interview at Vogue Paris was exactly what I predicted. I walked in with my conservative interview attire and waited patiently at the front desk and two interviewers came in, the female in with jeans and heels and the male jeans and leather oxfords. As jeans are considered “slang” dress meaning that it “tends to be loose, relaxed and colorful” (Lurie 8), both interviewers gave off a casual chic aura and I wondered if their personality matched what her clothes were communicating. Lurie states that “sartorial communication... can also be used to convey misinformation” which can voluntary or involuntary but careful manipulation of dress can shape other people’s first impression (Lurie 24). Was my prospective supervisors free spirited who has fun with their interns or are very uptight? I quickly discovered that it was the former as the interview was fairly casual and it allowed me to ask them what their previous experience was before working at Vogue Paris. Both interviewers were easy to talk to and they made me feel as if I were talking to my peers rather than superiors. However, when I first stepped into the Elle office with my flashy attire, I noticed that I was significantly over-dressed and I felt uncomfortable while I was waiting for my interviewer. Irving Goffman states that the concept of “proper dress” is “dependent on the situation” and the person “whose clothes do not conform to these standards is more or less subtly excluded from participation” and I wondered how my fur and rhinestones will affect the interviewer’s impression of me. My interviewer wore a plain black shift dress and 4 inch heels and I was relieved when she was heavily accessorized. She first commented on how she liked my collar and proceeded to ask me routine questions. After I told her about my past experiences and extracurricular activities, she asked me several questions about my work ethic. She asked how I would rate my work ethic on a scale of 1 to 10 and asked if I was willing to stay late if necessary. I was completely taken aback by how in depth she wanted me to talk about my work ethic. However, my interview with her was much longer than my interview at Vogue Paris so I hoped she found something favourable in me.
Damhorst’s study claims that employee’s first impression is very closely associated with what she wears and often correlates with her work ethic and behaviour. In the blog post “Should Women Avoid Carrying Birkins to Work?”, a reader asks whether it is appropriate for her to bring her Birkin to work at a small big law firm. People often advise to dress the position you would want to have but others advise to dress appropriate to your level at work. The blogger concludes that “the intern with a $9000 bag” may have negative connotations that would hurt the intern in the work place. The blogger states “you may find you have to work even harder to get the respect that you deserve” because people might think you’re “not working for money” (“Should Women Avoid Carrying Birkins to Work?”, 2010). This is similar in Damhorst’s study that the employee’s dress is reflective of her work ethic. Damhorst states that “those who are reviewed as expressing organizational values in dress and other behaviours are likely to receive greater validation for their appearances from persons in power in the organization” (Damhorst 49). Similarly, a contributor to the blog post “WTF Do I Wear to a Fashion Job Interview?” states, “Whenever I see recent grads dressed [head to toe in designer labels] I can’t help but think, spoiled little rich girl. Is she going to give me diva attitude when I’m having her cut swatches and make copies at 9pm at night?” (“WTF Do I wear to a Fashion Job Interview?”, 2009).
The fashion industry is difficult to dress appropriately for because each work environment has a different aesthetic and vibe. In an interview for the Fall issue of NYChic Magazine (pg 63-68), I asked fashion interns what the office environment was like at their internship ranging from Elle, Vogue, Karla Otto, Miu Miu, and Nick Knight Studio. The general consensus was that the interns were expected to dress more casual than their supervisors while still looked put together. In contrast, their superiors were often very dressed up (head to toe in Miu Miu or Prada at the corporate office) and are more feminine in heels and chiffon dresses. The corporate world and the fashion industry are almost polar opposites and in the corporate world, Damhorst claims that exhibitionism “may discredit the image of professionalism… [because of] extreme consequence of fashion” and “highly fashion forward [women] in the work place draws too much attention to [herself]” (53).
I decided to interview interns and supervisors regarding interview attire at my current internship at 3.1 Phillip Lim. I asked each intern what they wore for their interview and each intern generally wore the same thing consisting of a skirt with a cashmere sweater or blouse and a pair of heels or heeled boots. One intern asked her friend if it would be wise to wear 3.1 Phillip Lim to the interview and her friend strongly objected. I interviewed two sales assistants after they interviewed a girl for a sales internship position about the influence of dress on the interview. One sales assistant stated that while it is important what the intern wears for the interview, she does not associate the interviewee’s interview attire to her ability to work. She judges the interviewee’s clothes to better understand if the potential intern is interested in fashion and trends and whether or not she understands the brand’s aesthetic. The other sales assistant emphasized that he would not hire anyone who wears jean overalls or wears anything with large logos from Abercrombie. However, he later states that certain logos are acceptable. One thing I found extremely interesting was that they both agreed that they wouldn’t negatively judge a potential intern who shows up at the interview with an $8000 Hermes Birkin or $700 Christian Louboutin heels. Furthermore, while some people believe that dressing head to toe in the brand’s clothes seem like one is trying too hard, both sales assistants disagree and encourage the interviewee to represent the brand to the fullest.
I realized that dressing flashy did not necessarily result in bad connotations as my Elle interviewer spent more time questioning me to make me truly prove my capabilities. Like several blogs have stated, one has to push oneself more to sell herself if she chooses to communicate conspicuous leisure and consumption. By proving to the interviewer wrong and erasing the “spoiled little rich girl” impression, perhaps flashy dress is a good tactic to get the interviewer’s attention but should still have relevant experience in her resume. I didn’t hear back from Vogue Paris but I was offered a summer internship at Elle as an accessories intern. The fashion industry has a completely different set of rules when it comes for office appropriate attire as there are no rules but the limitations are a slippery slope. Through my field experiment, I realized that dressing conservatively works against the interviewee when looking for a job or internship in a luxury brand company or a high-end fashion magazine because the interviewer meets with many prospective interns that dress the same.
__________________
Bibliography
Bauman, Zygmunt. Consuming Life. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2007.
Damhorst, Mary Lynn and Patricia A. Kimle. “Symbolic Interaction: A Grounded Theory Model of the Ideal Business Image for Women.” Caliber 20(1) (1997): 45-66.
Lurie, Alison. The Language of Clothes. New York: Henry Holt and Co., 2000. pp.4-36
“Should Women Avoid Carrying Birkins to Work?” Corporette. Access Date: 21 March 2011. <http://corporette.com/2010/06/03/the-intern-with-the-9000-handbag>
“WTF Do I wear to a Fashion Job Interview?” 39thandbraodway.com. Access Date: 21 March 2011. < http://www.39thandbroadway.com/wtf-wear-fashion-interview>
Throughout my years at NYU, I've heard stories about an intern who showed up to her interview with a Birkin bag and was denied the position as a result. I'm not sure if this story was about an NYU student at one time or merely a cautionary tale that young people hear as they prepare for internships and a potential career. I think it's useful to compare the fashion and corporate world because although both are considered professional environments, one would clearly favor both interns and employees who indeed demonstrate a sense of fashion. This would allow interns to wear pieces, colors, styles, and designers to work that they ordinarily wouldn't be able to do in a traditional corporate job. While it seems like you had to elaborate to the interviewer about your work ethic, it was probably better to dress up than more casually, especially if it were for a styling position. That said, I wonder what the larger trend is across fashion magazines etc. regarding dress preferences for interns. It would be interesting to see if there were a trend regarding a hierarchy of dress, like the supervisors dressing more formally than interns, for example. The "spoiled little rich girl" stereotype seems unwarranted in an industry that pressures young women to purchase and wear such designers. Also, I wonder why supervisors don't consider the fact that the "spoiled little rich girl" actually has the financial means to work a non-paid internship.
ReplyDelete-Andrea Reres
It's hard to say which form of dressing works best because even within the fashion industry, each company is so different. I've interned at a few corporate offices and at a particular one, all my supervisors are so casual that I feel awkward wearing a collared shirt.
ReplyDeleteI also agree with the last part of your comment-- it takes a lot of financial security to work a part-time/full-time unpaid internship. I guess they're looking for the "little rich girl" with great work ethic!
This is an interesting take on "professional attire" in different environments. I know that on a personal level, I work in a corporate environment. When I have a meeting with an executive, I'll always put on heels to make myself look more put-together, taller, and more confident. With these heels, I'm sure to wear a very bland outfit--a top and a cardigan, paired with dress pants or a skirt--so as to not make myself too noticed. I feel a need to hide labels to "prove" my abilities. Once, the president of the company stopped by my office impromptu and complimented my Tory Burch ballet flats I was mortified--an object of conspicuous consumption on an intern. I thought immediately that I must seem like the "spoiled little rich girl" that you referenced in your analysis. Does that comment on my work ethic? No. But, are we still judged by it? Absolutely.
ReplyDeleteAs you found in your experiment, our appearance is taken (by others) to convey a lot about our personality. As Hollander notes, we have a need to be visually correct in any given situation. We have a need to dress in a certain way so as to fit our role (as intern, as interviewee, as somehow inferior). There is this need to feel safe and belong within a given set of structures, parameters, and limitations. It is interesting, however, to note that when you chose to be bold (displaying signals of lavish consumption), you stood out--and in what seems to have been a good way to the interviewers at Elle. Or, maybe you dressed the part? Was it your outfit that landed you the job, your personality in that outfit/in that role, or both? Which were you judged on?
As Goffman writes, you clearly knew your audience, and you were able to visually align yourself with them. For the Elle interview, you knew that you were going for an accessories intern position, and you dressed as such. You conveyed what seems to be an air of authenticity--you were just the candidate that they were looking for. But, to return back to my story in a standard corporate environment, why is there this difference? Why are the acceptable outfits and codes different depending on the space of work? Why do we feel the need to dress ourselves down as interns, to hide ourselves, to not stand out?
To return to Hollander, we want to feel safe and belong. We want to fit in. How can we be individuals, yet still belong? It seems that at the Elle interview you were given more of an opportunity to present an identity, rather than mix in with the crowd. Why is this somehow less acceptable in a corporate environment? How do we mix this sense of individuality with a sense of belonging?
Both Lauren and Andrea R. make great points. It is a fine line between demonstrating flair and style and going overboard with expensive attire/accessories. And while I agree completely that there is an understanding that one must be relatively financially secure in order to even consider an unpaid/poorly-compensated job or internship, expensive handbags and blatant designer labels are usually not the right choice. You demonstrate so much more imagination/resourcefulness by finding a smaller, lesser-known label/designer. Your potential employer will be inclined to inquire who made the item (instead of it being obvious) and they'll remember you more as a source for fresh lines and looks. Trust me!!
ReplyDeleteAnna